BMJ Open

Background Tobacco smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), stillbirth, and longer-term adverse health outcomes. Globally, reducing smoking in pregnancy is a key public health priority, yet the organisation, accessibility, and effectiveness of cessation support varies substantially between countries and healthcare systems. Differences in policy implementation, resource allocation, and integration of cessation services into antenatal care influence uptake and success rates across diverse settings. In England, pregnant women are entitled to free smoking cessation support, however, service delivery varies across regions with mixed efficacy. While tobacco smoking is more prevalent in deprived communities, there is limited understanding of how, why, for whom, and under what circumstances these services are most effective, particularly in areas of social deprivation, such as the North East and Yorkshire. Objective To conduct a realist evaluation to understand how smoking cessation services support pregnant women in areas of social deprivation to stop smoking and reduce adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods This multi-site realist evaluation will be conducted across three NHS maternity services in West Yorkshire, England. The study comprises four iterative stages: (1) development of initial programme theories through realist-informed literature scoping and stakeholder consultation; (2) case study data collection including qualitative interviews with pregnant women (approximately 15-30) and staff (approximately 15-30); (3) analysis of routine anonymised maternity and neonatal electronic data collected over a one-year period; and (4) realist analysis to refine context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations. Qualitative data will be analysed using realist logic supported by NVivo software. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics to explore associations between smoking cessation engagement and perinatal outcomes. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was obtained through the UK Health Research Authority and a Research Ethics Committee prior to study commencement (IRAS 364173; REC reference number 26/SC/0020). Findings will inform recommendations to improve smoking cessation support for pregnant women in deprived areas. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and stakeholder engagement.

Introduction Education is a core social determinant of health for children and adolescents. Unfortunately, academic achievement, health, and wellbeing of adolescents have decreased in many developed countries in the past decade. The purpose of the Wellbeing and Education linkages in school-aged children (WELL-ED) study is to examine associations of school absences and academic achievement with use of school-based and community-based health and social welfare services. In addition, we will assess user experiences and multi-sector services pathways of school-aged children for a better understanding of how the service system could respond to the needs of children. Methods and analysis WELL-ED is a large population-based study that combines register data on school absences and educational support from municipalities with register data on healthcare and social service use collected from wellbeing services counties in Finland. The study cohort includes all children who attended mandatory education in public schools in Southern Finland in school year 2023-2024. A smaller cohort of adolescents in school year 8 was invited to complete a user experience survey. The primary outcomes of this study are related to equity of service use. Ethics and dissemination The Regional Committee on Medical Research Ethics of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (2803/2024) has approved the WELL-ED study protocol. For the survey, adolescents in year 8 and parents of adolescents younger than 15 provided informed consent. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, summaries will be sent to participating municipalities and wellbeing services counties and press releases will be written on key findings.

Abstract Background: Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is the most common cancer among men in several Eastern African countries, yet treatment monitoring relies on imprecise, time-consuming ruler-based measurements defined by the AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG). This method suffers from inter-observer variability, fails to capture lesion height or true geometric area, and performs poorly on dark skin. SkinScan3D (SS3D) is a portable, low-cost, AI-enabled 3D imaging device that provides objective measurements of KS skin lesion area, height, volume, and color. The Precision Imaging to Evaluate Kaposi Sarcoma (PRIME-KS) study evaluates whether SS3D provides more reproducible and accurate lesion measurements than the standard method, and validates its integration into routine clinical workflows in Kenya and Uganda. Methods: PRIME-KS is a multicountry prospective mixed-methods study with two clinical objectives. Objective 1 is a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study comparing SS3D with ruler-based measurement in 50 adults with KS (150 lesions) across sites in Kenya and Uganda. Two clinicians independently measure three lesions per participant using both methods. The primary outcomes are concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for inter-rater reproducibility, and co-efficient of determination for accuracy. Objective 2 is a non-randomized before-and-after pilot study in 100 patients at three sites, evaluating device usability, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility using validated instruments, along with time-and-motion studies and activity-based micro-costing. Prior to these clinical objectives, a formative study used focus group discussions, discrete choice experiments, and human-centered design workshops to refine the SS3D device and protocols with end-user input. Discussion: PRIME-KS will provide the first rigorous evaluation of a 3D imaging device for monitoring KS treatment response in routine clinical settings. If SS3D demonstrates superior reproducibility and clinical utility, it could reduce unnecessary chemotherapy exposure and associated toxicities by enabling earlier, more objective assessment of treatment response. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06898203, registered 27 March 2025. Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202603523439856. Keywords Kaposi sarcoma, SkinScan3D, 3D imaging, treatment monitoring, diagnostic accuracy, implementation science, usability, human-centered design, Kenya, Uganda

Introduction: Trans and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals often face stigma and discrimination in healthcare, hindering access to gender-affirming care. Training healthcare workers on TGD health aims to foster inclusive and affirming care practices. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of TGD health training programs for healthcare workers. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023443288). We searched 13 databases for studies up to March 2024, with no language/geographic restrictions. Ten reviewers screened studies in pairs, resolving discrepancies via discussion or third-reviewer input. We included randomized/non-randomized comparative and before-after studies for quantitative analysis (mean difference [MD] or standardized mean difference [SMD] with 95% CIs) and qualitative/mixed-methods studies for thematic synthesis. Evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE (quantitative) and GRADE-CERQual (qualitative). Outcomes included knowledge, attitudes, skills, discrimination, competence, comfort, TGD quality of life, and stakeholder preferences. Results: From 20,188 records, 85 studies were included. Training appears to have improved healthcare workers' knowledge (SMD=1.08, 95% CI 0.78-1.39), attitudes (SMD=0.22, 95% CI 0.05-0.39), skills (SMD=0.96, 95% CI 0.56-1.37), competence (SMD=0.55, 95% CI 0.29-0.81), and comfort (SMD=0.69, 95% CI 0.17-1.21). Qualitative analysis of 130 findings identified 18 categories and four key themes on intervention design and impact. Conclusions: TGD training programs may enhance health workers' knowledge, attitudes, skills, competence, and comfort. Well-structured, interactive, and inclusive programs showed promise, but evidence certainty was low with limited follow-up. Further high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings.

Aim: Healthy Heart Actions Right Time (HHART) is a multi-phased research project that seeks to identify, implement and evaluate strategies to connect community and clinical activities to reduce the burden of heart disease for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The aim in Phase One was to identify priority activities for two participating services. Background: The ongoing effects of colonisation drive a disproportionate burden of heart disease for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Clinical and community groups both have established strengths in reducing the risk of heart disease, but these are not always well connected. Methods: Using a case study methodology in two locations we partnered in a 12-month co-design process to identify priority activities to connect clinical and community activities. Findings: Three priorities emerged from the Phase One co-design process: (i) community-led gardening as a strategy to promote heart health through connection and healthy lifestyles; (ii) community days to increase engagement in heart checks and strengthen community-clinic relationship; and (iii) clinic-led development of culturally relevant education resources to promote clinician confidence and community heart health knowledge.

Background: Two-thirds of Dutch cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) for patients at risk of cardiovascular disease is delivered in primary care practices. While individual risk scores are increasingly used during consultation, a population-level structure for risk-based patient outreach is not currently available. We therefore developed the PROSPERA programme, a multilevel intervention comprising population-level risk stratification and individual-level support tools. Aim: To assess anticipated and experienced barriers and facilitators among healthcare professionals (HCPs) to inform implementation in primary care. Methods: We conducted four focus groups and six interviews with nine primary care HCPs to explore anticipated and experienced barriers and facilitators. Inductive codes were thematically analysed and assigned to corresponding domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the related Capability, Opportunity, Motivation model of Behaviour. Results: Barriers and facilitators were identified in 11 TDF domains. Population-level barriers included altered professional roles and limitations in technological infrastructure. Individual-level barriers were limited skills in interpreting risk calculations and difficulty integrating tools into clinical routine. Facilitators were related to beliefs on the importance of providing proactive care (population level), the use of U-Prevent for risk communication (individual level) and positive patient responses to the Lifestylecheck questionnaire (individual level). Conclusion: Addressing barriers and facilitators identified at both the population and individual levels can support implementation of the PROSPERA programme. Opportunities exist in education and training of HCPs in risk communication, as well as support in restructuring the physical and digital environment.

Background Children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face an elevated risk of developmental delay, yet scalable neuroimaging tools to study early brain development in these contexts remain limited. Children who are HIV-exposed but uninfected (CHEU) represent a growing population with evidence of language and motor delays and altered brain development compared with children who are HIV-unexposed (CHU). Ultra-low-field (ULF) MRI offers a more affordable alternative to conventional high-field (HF) MRI, but its application in early childhood remains underexplored. Methods We compared brain volumes derived from ULF (64mT) and HF (3T) MRI in South African CHEU and CHU as part of the DolPHIN-2 PLUS study. Volumetric segmentation was performed using FreeSurfer v7.4.1 and SynthSeg on the Flywheel platform. Agreement between modalities was assessed using Pearsons and Lins concordance correlation coefficients across global and subcortical regions. Associations between ULF-derived brain volumes and developmental outcomes, measured by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition, were evaluated using partial correlations adjusted for sex and age. Results Forty-five children (9 CHEU, 36 CHU; mean age 45.6 months) had paired ULF and HF scans of usable quality. Strong correlations were observed between ULF and HF volumes for global white and grey matter regions (r > 0.92) and larger subcortical grey matter structures such as the thalamus, caudate, and putamen (r = 0.86-0.89). Moderate-to-weak correlations were evident in smaller structures (hippocampus, pallidum, amygdala). ULF underestimated most grey matter volumes, and overestimated total white matter volume relative to HF. ULF-derived global and subcortical volumes were associated with receptive and expressive communication (r = 0.34-0.59, all p < 0.05). Conclusions ULF MRI produces brain volume estimates comparable to HF MRI and captures meaningful associations with early language development. These findings support ULF MRI as a feasible and scalable tool for studying neurodevelopment in vulnerable paediatric populations in LMICs.

Introduction Indigenous peoples in Canada face persistent health inequities rooted in colonialism, systemic racism, discrimination and social exclusion, all of which operate with particular intensity within healthcare institutions. Despite a growing qualitative literature documenting the discrimination and stigmatisation of Indigenous people by healthcare professionals, no validated instrument existed in the Canadian context to measure the stigmatizing attitudes and behaviors of clinicians toward this population. Aim This study aimed to co-develop and validate an instrument using clinical case vignettes designed to capture the affective, cognitive, and behavioral dimensions of stigmatization of indigenous peoples. Method Following Boateng et al.'s three-phase scale development approach, a multidisciplinary team including Indigenous patient partners, researchers, clinicians, and measurement experts generated 244 items across three paired clinical vignettes addressing type 2 diabetes, chronic back pain, and depressive disorder. Each vignette was developed in two versions, one featuring an Indigenous patient (test) and one featuring a non-Indigenous patient (control), distinguished solely by name and origin. Content validity was assessed by an expert committee using a Content Validity Index. The instrument was subsequently administered to a sample of nurses and physicians from two canadian health institutions using a twelve-arm randomization design. Analyses were carried to assess the internal structure of the instrument, convergent and concurrent validity as well as internal consistency. Results Our results show that the instrument developed has good psychometric qualities, particularly in terms of internal consistency, concurrent validity and factor structure, which reflects the theoretical structure assumed. Concurrent validity of the tool with the M-PATAS scale demonstrated weak to moderate significant correlations. Developed through a participatory process centering Indigenous expertise and lived experience, this instrument constitutes a significant methodological advance in the study of racialized stigmatization in Canadian healthcare.

Objectives To explore caregiver and clinicians perspectives on implementing mental health conversations and supports for caregivers of children with chronic conditions in paediatric outpatient clinics. Specifically, views were sought on (a) screening approaches and measures (phase 1) and (b) how feedback and support could be provided to caregivers experiencing mental health difficulties (phase 2). Methods Caregivers and clinicians from two outpatient clinics (neuromuscular and diabetes) at a tertiary paediatric hospital in Melbourne, Australia participated in online focus groups in July and August 2024. Caregivers were recruited from outpatient clinics and clinicians were recruited via email. Both groups were combined for phase 1 before separating into breakout rooms for phase 2. Two authors conducted reflexive thematic analysis of transcripts using NVivo. Results Sixteen participants (caregivers n = 8; and clinicians n = 8) took part in in two semi-structured focus groups. Analysis generated two overarching domains, each comprising multiple themes. Domain 1, Addressing caregiver mental health, captured themes of overwhelm and invisibility, diverse caregiving roles, and the need for time and resources to support wellbeing conversations. Domain 2, Housing the mental health conversation, encompassed themes of screening preferences, caregiver agency in confidentiality, delivery of feedback, and access to tailored supports. Conclusions Caregivers and clinicians support routine caregiver mental health discussions in paediatric outpatient settings. Caregivers favour screening at diagnosis and key transitions, with clear, and actionable feedback delivered away from the child. Questions about record-keeping warrant further exploration, as do the perspectives of fathers.

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has demonstrated a significant reduction in HIV infections among men who have sex with men (MSM), however, low medication adherence hinders its preventative effectiveness. Traditional approaches, such as health education and face-to-face inquiry (HEF), have demonstrated certain efficacy in improving PrEP adherence. However, these methods are resource-intensive and often plagued by delays, rendering timely and precise interventions challenging. This randomized controlled trial aims to assess the effectiveness of an intervention comprising AI-chatbot for PrEP (PrEP-bot) and Smart pillbox (SPB) (PrEP-bot-SPB) strategy to improve PrEP adherence among MSM compared to HEF.Methods and analysis: A three-arm, multicenter, open-lable RCT will be conducted with Chinese MSM [&ge;]18 years. A total of 300 participants will be recruited through three sources, including hospitals, community-based organizations (CBOs) and peer referral in five cities: Shenzhen, Beijing, Qingdao, Hangzhou and Zhengzhou. After completing baseline survey, participants will be randomized evenly into interventions or control groups: the PrEP-bot group, the PrEP-bot-SPB group, and the HEF control group. Participants in the PrEP-bot group will be granted access to an AI-chatbot agent through WeChat. This agent will: 1) generate personalized PrEP medication plans; 2) provide medication reminders and PrEP-related health check-ups notifications; 3) inquire about missed doses to deliver tailored interventions; 4) answer participant questions about PrEP using guideline-based knowledge. Participants in the PrEP-bot-SPB group will receive both the SPB and the PrEP-bot interventions. SPB could delivers medication reminders. Participants in HEF group will receive a health education pamphlet introducing PrEP and knowledge related to PrEP medication adherence at baseline and face-to-face inquiry every three months. Outcomes will be assessed for both short-term and medium-to-long-term effects. The primary objective is the effectiveness in improving PrEP adherence measured by self-report, Eight-Item Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS-8) and concentration of Tenofovir in dried blood spots (DBS) (PrEP adherence [&ge;]90%) at 3 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes include: 1) effectiveness in preventing HIV infection measured by HIV-self test (HIVST); 2) effectiveness of PrEP-related health check-ups; 3) the effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, and user satisfaction with the PrEP-bot; 4) effectiveness in improving PrEP adherence at 6-month, 9-month and 12-month follow-up periods. All participants will receive quarterly follow-up visits during the 12-month study period. Intention-to-treat analysis and per protocol set (PPS) analysis will be used.Results: Recruitment and enrollment of participants began in January 2026 and is currently ongoing.Discussion: This study is expected to establish a novel AI-based intervention model for PrEP, providing innovative strategies for HIV control among MSM populations. If the PrEP-bot is proven non-inferior to HEF, it could offer users real-time, precise, and personalized interventions while simultaneously addressing PrEP-related inquiries and health check-ups reminders. Importantly, this approach would achieve significant reductions in resource requirements for implementation and maintenance and be more cost-effective. With the ongoing advancement of AI technologies, PrEP-bot holds substantial promise for widespread implementation in PrEP adherence, potentially revolutionizing HIV prevention for MSM in China through this innovative intervention modality.Trial registration: ChiCTR2500111280 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry). Date of registration: 29 October 2025.

Background Chronic pain is common in adults aged 85 years and older (85+) and is associated with detrimental outcomes. Chronic pain guidelines advise first line management with non-pharmacological measures; paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the preferred analgesics. Challenges in accessing non-pharmacological therapies for adults aged 85+, and the presence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, mean that opioid medication is often prescribed for chronic pain despite the potential for opioid-related adverse effects and guidance identifying long-term opioids for chronic pain as a potentially inappropriate prescription. Aim This study aims to explore patient, caregiver, and healthcare professional perspectives on the prescription of opioid medications for pain management for chronic pain in adults aged 85+ to support development of resources for optimising opioid prescribing. Design and Setting In this qualitative study, participants were recruited through primary care, in the community or in care home settings. Method 36 semi-structured interviews were conducted with care home residents and community dwellers aged 85+ (n=12), caregivers (informal and care home staff) (n=12), and healthcare professionals (n=12). Interviews were transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Four themes were developed: contextual complexity, satellite influences, balancing act, and pragmatic prescribing. Using opioids in adults aged 85+ is a balancing act to support patients best possible quality of life within their unique circumstances whilst using the pain management tools available. Conclusion Opioids continue to have an important role in pain management in adults aged 85+ largely due to paucity of alternatives and the drive to support quality of life.

Purpose In deprescribing studies, a prescription-free gap is typically used to determine if patients discontinued their treatment. An appropriate gap depends on the typical time between prescriptions during continued use. This work aims to characterise the interval between prescriptions of chronic drugs using different methods for a cohort of older people in primary care in Ireland. Methods The empirical prescription interval was analysed for 38,154 patients for the twenty most common drug classes and the association between covariates and the interval was analysed using a multi-level model. Estimates were also compared to those obtained from the parametric waiting time distribution (pWTD) approach. Results Available covariates had consistent relationships with prescription intervals across drug classes. For example, each additional prescription issue was associated with an increase in the interval by 5.0 (NSAIDs) to 19.7 days ("Other antidepressants"). Full public health cover was associated with a -29.0 day (inhaled adrenergics) to -11.0 day (opioids) change relative to partial cover, while other/private cover had a -17.9 day (benzodiazepines and associated drugs) to -7.1 day (SSRI and SNRIs) change relative to partial cover. The pWTD also produced consistent estimates of the population interval for most drugs. Conclusions The interval varied substantially within drug classes, due to a mixture of patient, practice and unmodelled factors. Variation between practices was effectively explained, with residual variation between patients and within patients. The pWTD approach is useful for describing complex distributions of intervals, and may be more appropriate for inferring a gap than summarising truncated data.

Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are rapidly reshaping healthcare education and simulation-based training in non-technical skills (NTS), yet no bibliometric analysis has mapped this landscape. We searched seven open-access databases (OpenAlex, PubMed, Europe PMC, Crossref, Semantic Scholar, CORE, DOAJ) for English-language publications from January 2020 to March 2026. From 100,277 initial records, a sequential keyword funnel yielded 830 candidate papers, which were screened by 83 independent Claude Sonnet 4.6 AI agents applying pre-specified inclusion criteria (PRISMA-trAIce compliant; Cohen's kappa = 0.86 pre-reconciliation, 1.0 post-reconciliation). The final AI-verified corpus comprised 551 papers with a compound annual growth rate of 109%, contributions from 2,398 authors across 279 journals in 58 countries, and an h-index of 41. ChatGPT dominated the model landscape (46% of papers), with open-source models virtually absent. Virtual patient chatbots were the leading simulation modality (106 papers). Among NTS domains, communication (145 papers) and decision-making (135 papers) were most studied, whereas teamwork, leadership, situational awareness, and crisis resource management were markedly underrepresented. Only 6 urology-relevant papers were identified, none examining LLM integration within boot camp training formats. The field is growing at extraordinary pace but remains concentrated in a narrow range of NTS domains and a single proprietary model. Critical gaps persist in team-based skills training, open-source model evaluation, and specialty-specific simulation. AI-assisted bibliometric screening using multiple independent agents is feasible, reliable, and scalable, offering a replicable methodology for mapping fast-evolving research fields.

Introduction: Blackpool, England's most deprived local authority, has the highest drug-related death rate in the country. People in police custody with problem substance use are a key Core20PLUS5 inclusion-health group, yet referral from the police into structured drug and alcohol treatment is fragmented and relies heavily on self-report. We evaluated the current police-to-treatment route in Blackpool and designed an evidence-informed unified pathway. Materials and Methods: A mixed-methods service evaluation and pathway-design project was conducted during a six-month General Practice / Public Health rotation. Routinely collected referral data from Horizon (the local specialist drug and alcohol service) covering the 47-month period from December 2019 to October 2023 were analysed. Findings were triangulated with national policy, the Project ADDER and Liaison and Diversion evaluations, and the international evidence on police-led pre-arrest diversion. Results: Of 5,900 total referrals into Horizon over 47 months, only 269 (4.56%) originated from the police. Police referrals accounted for fewer than 5% of monthly referrals in 30 of 47 months, for 5 to 9.9% in 16 months, and for >/= 10% in only one month (10.8%, December 2022). Blackpool recorded 76 drug-misuse deaths in 2019-21 (19.4 per 100,000, approximately four times the England rate). A six-step unified pathway is proposed: Initiate Referral (opt-out, from ADDER Police and Liaison and Diversion); Initial Assessment; Tailored Treatment Plan; Continuous Support; Collaboration and Monitoring; and Evaluation and Adjustment. Conclusions: Police contact is markedly under-used as a gateway to treatment despite Blackpool having the highest drug-related mortality in England. An opt-out, multi-agency pathway anchored in Core20PLUS5 has the potential to narrow the treatment gap, reduce re-offending, and address the structural health inequalities that drive premature mortality.

Background Fertility rates in Australia have been declining over recent decades, reaching a record low total fertility rate of 1.48 births per woman in 2024. Concurrently, vasectomy remains widely accessible and increasingly normalised as a permanent contraceptive option. Despite extensive commentary on falling birth rates, no contemporary Australian study has examined vasectomy rates relative to birth rates over time. We aimed to compare population level vasectomy and birth rates across Australian jurisdictions and age groups. Study design Nationwide retrospective time-series study. Retrospective population-based study using Medicare Benefits Schedule item 37623 to identify vasectomy procedures performed between July 2015 and December 2024. Rates were calculated per 100,000 male population using quarterly Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) population estimates and summarised as rolling 12-month averages. Birth rates were derived using matched ABS data for women across equivalent age strata (18-24, 25-34, 35-44 years). Results: Vasectomy rates increased nationally from 32 per 100,000 in 2016 to 55 per 100,000 in 2023 before declining modestly in 2024. Birth rates declined from 5,200 to 3,800 per 100,000 over the same period. Trends were consistent across states and age groups, with the greatest vasectomy uptake in men aged 35-44 years. Conclusion: Australia is undergoing a demographic shift characterised by rising vasectomy uptake and declining fertility. While vasectomy rates remain lower than birth rates, their convergence signals changing reproductive intentions and contraceptive behaviours. Ongoing monitoring of permanent and long-acting contraception is essential to understand evolving population dynamics and inform reproductive health policy.

Background: Whole-population linked administrative data platforms provide an opportunity to generate evidence on early life multidimensional disadvantage to inform resourcing and service provision to families with complex needs. Methods: We used individual-level de-identified data from nine administrative data sources included in the Better Evidence Better Outcomes Linked Data (BEBOLD) platform. The population included all children born in South Australia between 2004-2011 (n=143,083), and their parents. We described the prevalence and distribution of multiple disadvantages affecting children from the 12 months before birth to age 5. Eleven domains of parental disadvantage were created: economic, education, access to services, mental health, substance misuse, smoking during pregnancy, domestic and family violence, health, child protection contact, justice system contact, and death. We investigated the concordance of our measure with an area-level socioeconomic measure used in government reporting. Results: One in two children (48%) were exposed to at least one disadvantage domain, and one in seven (14%) were exposed to three or more domains before age five. Economic disadvantage was most prevalent, affecting one in four (27%) children, of which 75% were exposed to additional forms of disadvantage. Substance misuse, domestic and family violence, and justice system contact were the least likely domains to occur in isolation. Only 54.4% who experienced five or more disadvantage domains were classified in the area-level socioeconomic measure's 'most disadvantaged' quintile. Conclusion: Early life exposure to parental disadvantage can be highly multidimensional. Measurement across different systems is important for informing coordinated service provision for families with complex needs.

Objective To map national Parkinsons disease (PD) research capability to inform an inclusive delivery strategy for a large-scale clinical trial. Background Few people with PD participate in clinical trials, particularly from under-served populations. The Edmond J Safra Accelerating Clinical Trials in PD initiative (EJS ACT-PD) aims to deliver an inclusive multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) disease modification PD trial. Methods A survey disseminated to National Health Service (NHS) hospitals assessed PD research capability regarding trial experience, rater expertise, trial facilities and specialist investigations. A process was developed to categorise sites into 3 tiers, with tier 1 having the least PD-research capability or experience, and tier 3 being experienced specialist centres. We mapped tiers to PD prevalence, social deprivation and ethnic diversity to identify infrastructure gaps. We developed trial delivery strategies to facilitate rapid and inclusive recruitment. Results Out of 97 survey responses, 43 sites were categorised as tier 1, 33 as tier 2 and 21 as tier 3. Diversity and social deprivation index were higher for tier 3 sites (predominantly urban). A greater proportion of tier 1 and 2 sites were situated in areas of higher PD prevalence (predominantly rural). Ninety one percent of sites reported experience with remote trial delivery methods. Our delivery strategy included: initial trial set-up at tier 3 sites to enable rapid and ethnically diverse recruitment; core funded staff within strategic sites to develop regional solutions for inclusive trial participation and to enable research opportunity provision in areas where currently very little exists, and a hybrid delivery model of in-person and remote study visits, ensuring maximal acceptability and deliverability. Conclusions The mapping of current PD research delivery capability has allowed us to develop a trial delivery strategy that will broaden the provision of research participation opportunity to under-served groups. It has also enabled existing infrastructure to be maximised while mitigating identified gaps.

Background: Adults with severe mental health conditions (often referred to as severe mental illness, SMI) experience 15 to 20 year mortality gap relative to the general population, with lung cancer a significant contributor. National cancer policy targets earlier diagnosis but does not explicitly address how pathways function for this group. Aims: This study aimed to describe lung cancer risk, prevalence, screening eligibility, referral activity and diagnostic pathway performance for adults with SMI in South East London (SEL), and to examine where along the pathway inequalities arise. Methods: Co-designed with experts with lived experience and voluntary sector, this exploratory mixed-methods service evaluation combined quantitative analysis of routinely collected data from the Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF), SMI Register and Cancer Waiting Times Record (April 2023-March 2024) with semi-structured qualitative interviews (n=11 clinical staff) and focus groups (n=6 adults with lived experience of SMI). Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and framework-based thematic analysis respectively, and findings were integrated using a joint display approach, organised by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results: Lung cancer prevalence was approximately double among adults with SMI (0.17% vs 0.09% in the general population). Despite Urgent Suspected Cancer (USC) referral rates being more than twice as high in the SMI population (63 vs 28 per 100,000), fewer cancers were detected via planned general practice (GP) routes (11% vs 20%), the 28-day Faster Diagnosis Standard was not met for any SMI patient diagnosed with lung cancer during the study period; overall FDS performance was 76% in the SMI population compared with 84% in the general population; and appointment non-attendance was more than double that in the general population (6% vs 3%). Qualitative findings identified individual, service and system-level mechanisms, including stigma, diagnostic overshadowing, fragmented coordination, and rigid pathway protocols, that compound disadvantage across lung cancer pathway stages. Conclusions: Inequality in lung cancer outcomes for adults with SMI accumulates across the pathway rather than arising at a single point of failure. Addressing this requires proportionate adaptations within existing cancer pathways, alongside routine reporting of cancer outcomes stratified by SMI population. Keywords: severe mental health conditions, lung cancer, health inequalities, cancer screening, diagnostic pathway, mixed methods

While significant progress has been made in perinatal outcomes over recent decades in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), maternal and newborn quality improvement initiatives often fail to account for the spatial conditions in which they are implemented. Health systems are increasingly deploying evidence-based care models into built environments that are not optimally structured to meet the needs of its patient population. As the principal users, patients and health care workers can offer pragmatic insights about improving these structural designs. Our objective was to gather insights from patients, providers, and companions about how the physical design of their health facilities influenced their experience receiving or delivering perinatal care. We conducted a prospective observational study using a human-centred design (HCD) approach to analyse perceptions of the quality of perinatal care across two low resource settings: Ethiopia and Bangladesh. Using engagement and assessment tools, we conducted interviews, focus groups, facility walk-throughs, co-design workshops, and infrastructural assessments with patients, companions, providers, and Ministry of Health representatives. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to identify key learnings and develop recommendations. Across both countries, participants identified the need for facility layouts that better support privacy, mobility during labour, alternative birth positions, companion involvement, cultural and religious practices, sanitation, and provider visibility. Based on these insights, we developed six recommendations to better align health facility infrastructure with maternal and newborn care delivery needs. Our findings suggest that investments in health facility infrastructure may improve care experiences and help enable respectful, safe, and evidence-based maternal and newborn care. Alongside targeted spatial improvements, government authorities responsible for health facility planning should incorporate participatory design processes to ensure infrastructure reflects the needs of patients, companions, and providers and supports high-quality care delivery.

Introduction Care home (CH) influenza vaccination of staff improves resident health, yet uptake remains low at just over 11% (England, 2025/2026). We report an economic evaluation (EE) of "FluCare", an intervention to increase staff influenza vaccination through: vaccination clinics at CHs; promotional materials; and CH financial incentives. Method Seventy-five CHs were randomised to FluCare or control. A cost-consequence analysis took the influenza vaccination programme funder perspective, but also extended to the National Health Service (NHS) and CH perspective. Costs included: influenza vaccination; administration fee; FluCare components; CH resident NHS utilisation. Outcomes were: staff influenza vaccination rates; staff sickness; and resident mortality. Sensitivity analyses excluded intervention CHs that did not host vaccination clinics. Results Compared to control CHs, adjusted analysis found intervention homes with a mean absolute increase in vaccination rates of 1.8% (95% CI: -6.0%, 10.8%; p=0.572) at an increased cost of {pound}451 (95% CI: {pound}239, {pound}675; p<0.001) to the vaccination programme funders: {pound}249 per additional percentage point (PAPP) per CH. Vaccination clinics were delivered late in the influenza season, with 80% taking place from February 2023. Including only intervention CHs that hosted staff flu vaccination clinics (23/35), increases the mean difference to 10.1% (95% CI: 0.9%, 21.9%; p=0.018) and costs to {pound}805 (95% CI: {pound}603, {pound}1,079; p<0.001): {pound}79 PAPP per CH. Differences between trial arms in other costs and outcomes were marginal and generally non-significant. Conclusions FluCare delivered little improvement when staff flu vaccination clinics did not occur and had little impact on other costs/outcomes. Cost-effectiveness depends on willingness-to-pay for increased staff vaccination, but cost PAPP per CH improved from {pound}249 to {pound}79 when only CHs hosting clinics were considered. Late implementation, likely reduced impact by limiting clinic delivery, as reflected in sensitivity analysis. Future evaluations should implement FluCare earlier in the season.